Findr logo
Findr text logo
Sign InGet Started

Exploring the Differences: Elasticsearch vs. Vector Search in Enterprise Environments

Nishkarsh Srivastava
Nishkarsh SrivastavaCEO

Published on May 24 2024

Last Updated on Jun 18 2024


In today's data-driven world, enterprises are constantly seeking efficient and powerful workplace search solutions to unlock the value hidden within their vast amounts of information. 

Elasticsearch and Vector Search have emerged as two popular choices for enterprises looking to optimize their search capabilities. Both offer unique features and advantages, but understanding their differences is crucial in making an informed decision for your enterprise environment. 

In this article, you'll explore the distinctions between Elasticsearch and Vector Search, shedding light on their strengths and use cases.

Unravelling the concept

With its real-time capabilities, Elasticsearch, an open-source distributed search and analytics engine, revolutionizes data handling. It uses a document-oriented strategy and indexes to store data in JSON. It supports many query methods and offers blazing-fast searches thanks to inverted indexes. Inverted indexes are more efficient as they enable rapid retrieval of information in large datasets. Unlike traditional forward indexes that map terms to documents, inverted indexes map documents to terms. 

On the other hand, Vector Search, a cutting-edge approach, employs deep learning and machine learning techniques. It represents documents as vector embeddings, capturing semantic content. Embeddings are numerical representations that encode the meaning and relationships of words or documents in a multi-dimensional space. This enables similarity-based searches, allowing for more precise and nuanced results. Embeddings are particularly useful when context knowledge or understanding of purpose is essential for accurate search outcomes.

Elasticsearch vs. Vector Search 

In the realm of workplace search solutions, Elasticsearch and Vector Search have emerged as powerful contenders. Let's delve into their differences and discover which one suits your organization's needs.

Use Cases and Strengths

Elasticsearch is a potent technology with many applications. It performs exceptionally well in applications where textual information is essential, such as online shopping sites for product search and location-based services like ride-hailing and real estate listings. Elasticsearch is also perfect for log analysis, monitoring, and business intelligence because it can handle structured data.

However, vector Search has recently emerged as a powerful technology enabling employees to search across their internal knowledge bases. Leveraging vector embeddings allows for a more intuitive and effective search experience within an organization's vast collection of internal documents, databases, and resources. This empowers employees to quickly access relevant information and leverage the collective knowledge within the organization, fostering productivity and informed decision-making.

Scalability and Performance

Elasticsearch is renowned for its superb distributed architecture and scalability. To handle large amounts of data and high query volumes, it can horizontally scale across numerous nodes. Sharding and replication algorithms integrated into the system guarantee fault tolerance and high availability. Due to its distributed architecture, Elasticsearch is appropriate for environments with big clusters and high throughput demands.

On the other hand, despite vector embeddings' processing demands, Vector Search operates best with smaller datasets. Nonetheless, with advancements like approximate nearest neighbor search, it can effectively handle moderately large datasets. Nearest neighbor search is a technique used to find data points that are closest to a given query point in a high-dimensional space. 

In Vector Search, it identifies the most similar vector embeddings to a query embedding, while K-nearest neighbor (KNN) search is a variation that retrieves the top K closest data points. In Vector Search, KNN search is used to fetch the top K most similar embeddings to a query.

Query Flexibility and Relevance

Elasticsearch offers a wide range of querying capabilities, including boolean queries, phrase matching, fuzzy matching, and relevance scoring. Its scoring algorithms consider factors like term frequency, inverse document frequency, and field length normalization to rank search results based on relevance. Elasticsearch's querying flexibility allows enterprises to fine-tune their search parameters and retrieve the most accurate results for their specific use cases.

Vector Search, in contrast, primarily focuses on similarity-based search, where documents are sorted according to how closely they resemble or are far from a query vector. This method works well in situations when knowing the context and degree of similarity between papers is important. It might not, however, offer as much flexibility as Elasticsearch's extensive array of querying capabilities. When assessing these solutions, businesses should consider their unique search needs and prioritize query flexibility or semantic similarity.

Maintenance and Support

Elasticsearch, as a well-established open-source project, enjoys the advantage of having a large and active developer community. This community contributes to the project by providing support, sharing knowledge, and developing plugins and extensions to enhance its functionality. With a sizable user base, businesses can tap into a vast knowledge base, lively forums, and frequent updates, ensuring a reliable and well-maintained search system. Elastic, the organization behind Elasticsearch, also offers commercial support and additional functionality, further bolstering the support available to businesses.

In contrast, Vector Search, being a relatively newer approach, may not have the same level of developer community support as Elasticsearch. However, with the increasing adoption of machine learning and deep learning techniques, the developer community for Vector Search is growing. Enterprises now have access to guidance and help for properly deploying and sustaining Vector Search thanks to an increase in resources, tutorials, and community support. Although the developer community for Vector Search may still be developing, the rising need for this technology is anticipated to draw more developers, leading to additional opportunities for community support and collaboration in the future.

Cost Considerations

Enterprises wishing to adopt powerful search capabilities have a cost-effective choice in Elasticsearch, an open-source technology. The fundamental Elasticsearch software is free, but there may be fees for commercial support and extra features.

Depending on the specific frameworks and libraries used, Vector Search may require additional computational resources and infrastructure, such as GPUs (Graphics Processing Units), to generate and store vector embeddings effectively. GPUs are expensive specialized hardware known for their parallel processing capabilities. Their inclusion in the infrastructure increases implementation and maintenance costs, including power and cooling expenses. Enterprises should carefully assess their budget and resource requirements when considering this approach.

Bottom Line

Elasticsearch and Vector Search offer distinct approaches to workplace search, each with its strengths and advantages. ElasticSearch excels in traditional text-based search, scalability, and ecosystem integration, making it ideal for applications like online shopping, location-based services, log analysis, and business intelligence. 

On the other hand, Vector Search's advanced capabilities, including semantic understanding and similarity-based searches, make it valuable for recommendation systems, content filtering, and internal knowledge base search. 

By carefully evaluating specific search requirements, scalability needs, ecosystem integration, and budget constraints, businesses can determine the most suitable workplace search solution or even consider a combination of both to create a comprehensive search strategy tailored to their needs.


How do Elasticsearch and Vector Search differ?

Vector Search uses machine learning to offer similarity-based search using vector embeddings, whereas Elasticsearch is a document-oriented search engine with robust querying capabilities.

Which solution is better for text-based search?

Elasticsearch has strong querying capabilities and scalability for handling massive volumes of textual data, making it a good choice for full-text search applications. 

In what scenarios does Vector Search excel?

Applications like recommendation systems, content-based filtering, and multimedia search, which call for enhanced search capabilities beyond keyword matching, excel when using Vector Search.